<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How to write good emails</title>
	<atom:link href="http://missioncontrol.itteco.org/2010/02/26/how-to-write-good-emails/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://missioncontrol.itteco.org/2010/02/26/how-to-write-good-emails/</link>
	<description>Project Tales &#38; Lesson Learned by Itteco Scrum Masters</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 25 Apr 2010 13:05:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ivan Paramonau</title>
		<link>http://missioncontrol.itteco.org/2010/02/26/how-to-write-good-emails/comment-page-1/#comment-15</link>
		<dc:creator>Ivan Paramonau</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Mar 2010 13:28:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://missioncontrol.itteco.org/?p=61#comment-15</guid>
		<description>Eric Schmidt said Twitter is poor&#039;s man email when it just showed up. 

Very true with regard to technology. But what we should learn is that people actually started using emails in Twitter-like manner (me - no exception). It means:
 * actionable subject lines
 * short messages
 * perhaps, no Hi, Dear, etc.

I am mostly using emails for tracking actions and to-dos which are either small enough to get into a tracking system, or are urgent enough to make ensure that attention is given to it. Not immediate attention though - if immediate action is required, I would use IM or phone follow up.

For this, if you can:
 * put the bigger content into wiki or tracking system. If it&#039;s urgent or important not to forget - send me the link with short follow up
 * put a clear subject line - so that when I star the email, I know what I wanted to do about it next time I visit it. 
 * Be careful with Reply action - change the subject line or start a new thread as the subject changes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Eric Schmidt said Twitter is poor&#8217;s man email when it just showed up. </p>
<p>Very true with regard to technology. But what we should learn is that people actually started using emails in Twitter-like manner (me &#8211; no exception). It means:<br />
 * actionable subject lines<br />
 * short messages<br />
 * perhaps, no Hi, Dear, etc.</p>
<p>I am mostly using emails for tracking actions and to-dos which are either small enough to get into a tracking system, or are urgent enough to make ensure that attention is given to it. Not immediate attention though &#8211; if immediate action is required, I would use IM or phone follow up.</p>
<p>For this, if you can:<br />
 * put the bigger content into wiki or tracking system. If it&#8217;s urgent or important not to forget &#8211; send me the link with short follow up<br />
 * put a clear subject line &#8211; so that when I star the email, I know what I wanted to do about it next time I visit it.<br />
 * Be careful with Reply action &#8211; change the subject line or start a new thread as the subject changes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sasha K.</title>
		<link>http://missioncontrol.itteco.org/2010/02/26/how-to-write-good-emails/comment-page-1/#comment-14</link>
		<dc:creator>Sasha K.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 11:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://missioncontrol.itteco.org/?p=61#comment-14</guid>
		<description>Good points :) Here are my 10 cents on email management.

From my experience dealing with huge amount of emails I can say one thing - don&#039;t sit in your email client for 24/7. Get some rules for yourself - check email 3 times a day, or two - believe me, it will make your day much more productive and will allow you to focus on what&#039;s important. Make sure people know when you are checking emails, so they will be aware of the reply time period. If something urgent comes up - there is always IM or phone, so no need to panic that you are going to miss an urgent email. Email meant to be asynchronous - and it works best this way.

When checking email, I follow the pattern of PIFEM (which is actually based on 4 D&#039;s of email management: do, delete, delegate, defer). It&#039;s specifically designed for Outlook, however, can be implemented in any sufficient email client (http://blogs.msdn.com/ianpal/archive/2008/06/03/email-task-and-time-management-with-pifem.aspx#).

Furthermore, Inbox 0 has been my most valuable achievement in the last two years. You really can feel the tension go away when you have 0 emails in your inbox.

Don&#039;t forget the EOM (you can read more here http://lifehacker.com/5028808/how-eom-makes-your-email-more-efficient)

If you think email will take more than 10 minutes to compose, why not call the people involved or discuss it in person - it will save you much of time and stop threads of further emails. Try to keep emails to one paragraph. Great ideas I&#039;ve used for a while now - http://www.lifehack.org/articles/communication/mastering-the-short-email.html.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good points <img src='http://missioncontrol.itteco.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  Here are my 10 cents on email management.</p>
<p>From my experience dealing with huge amount of emails I can say one thing &#8211; don&#8217;t sit in your email client for 24/7. Get some rules for yourself &#8211; check email 3 times a day, or two &#8211; believe me, it will make your day much more productive and will allow you to focus on what&#8217;s important. Make sure people know when you are checking emails, so they will be aware of the reply time period. If something urgent comes up &#8211; there is always IM or phone, so no need to panic that you are going to miss an urgent email. Email meant to be asynchronous &#8211; and it works best this way.</p>
<p>When checking email, I follow the pattern of PIFEM (which is actually based on 4 D&#8217;s of email management: do, delete, delegate, defer). It&#8217;s specifically designed for Outlook, however, can be implemented in any sufficient email client (<a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/ianpal/archive/2008/06/03/email-task-and-time-management-with-pifem.aspx#)" rel="nofollow">http://blogs.msdn.com/ianpal/archive/2008/06/03/email-task-and-time-management-with-pifem.aspx#)</a>.</p>
<p>Furthermore, Inbox 0 has been my most valuable achievement in the last two years. You really can feel the tension go away when you have 0 emails in your inbox.</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t forget the EOM (you can read more here <a href="http://lifehacker.com/5028808/how-eom-makes-your-email-more-efficient)" rel="nofollow">http://lifehacker.com/5028808/how-eom-makes-your-email-more-efficient)</a></p>
<p>If you think email will take more than 10 minutes to compose, why not call the people involved or discuss it in person &#8211; it will save you much of time and stop threads of further emails. Try to keep emails to one paragraph. Great ideas I&#8217;ve used for a while now &#8211; <a href="http://www.lifehack.org/articles/communication/mastering-the-short-email.html." rel="nofollow">http://www.lifehack.org/articles/communication/mastering-the-short-email.html.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
